<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 855 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the additional amounts added by the Assessing Officer related to unaccounted cash items. The Tribunal held that the surrendered income should be available to explain the unaccounted cash amounts, granting the benefit of telescoping and rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions confirmed by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 855 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the additional amounts added by the Assessing Officer related to unaccounted cash items. The Tribunal held that the surrendered income should be available to explain the unaccounted cash amounts, granting the benefit of telescoping and rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions confirmed by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>