<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Medical Instruments Placement at Hospitals Classified as &quot;Supply&quot; u/s 7 of CGST Act, Rules AAAR.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62638</link>
    <description>Supply or not - placement of specified medical instruments by the appellant at the premises of unrelated hospitals, labs etc. in pursuance of the agreement for their use for a specific period - movement of goods otherwise than by way of supply or not - Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 - It is well settled principle that a taxing statute must be interpreted in the light of what is clearly expressed; it cannot imply anything, which is not expressed, it cannot import provisions in the statute so as to supply any assumed deficiency. - Thus, it is evident that the activity or transaction undertaken by the appellant qualifies to be categorised as &quot;supply&quot; - AAAR</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Medical Instruments Placement at Hospitals Classified as &quot;Supply&quot; u/s 7 of CGST Act, Rules AAAR.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62638</link>
      <description>Supply or not - placement of specified medical instruments by the appellant at the premises of unrelated hospitals, labs etc. in pursuance of the agreement for their use for a specific period - movement of goods otherwise than by way of supply or not - Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 - It is well settled principle that a taxing statute must be interpreted in the light of what is clearly expressed; it cannot imply anything, which is not expressed, it cannot import provisions in the statute so as to supply any assumed deficiency. - Thus, it is evident that the activity or transaction undertaken by the appellant qualifies to be categorised as &quot;supply&quot; - AAAR</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>