<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1199 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420161</link>
    <description>The court set aside the adjustment of the refund and instructed the respondents to reevaluate the intimation under Section 245 after considering the petitioner&#039;s objections within six weeks. If entitled, the refund was to be processed promptly. The decision emphasized the importance of following due process and ensuring that adjustments under Section 245 are made in accordance with the law, particularly when the demand is under appeal and subject to a stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1199 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420161</link>
      <description>The court set aside the adjustment of the refund and instructed the respondents to reevaluate the intimation under Section 245 after considering the petitioner&#039;s objections within six weeks. If entitled, the refund was to be processed promptly. The decision emphasized the importance of following due process and ensuring that adjustments under Section 245 are made in accordance with the law, particularly when the demand is under appeal and subject to a stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>