<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1195 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in cancelling the original assessments and directing fresh assessments without any new incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing that no addition can be made in an unabated assessment without new material discovered during a search. The orders of the Principal Commissioner were deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1195 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in cancelling the original assessments and directing fresh assessments without any new incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing that no addition can be made in an unabated assessment without new material discovered during a search. The orders of the Principal Commissioner were deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>