<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties under Section 271D for both assessment years, finding that the journal entries were made for legitimate business purposes, constituted reasonable cause under Section 273B, and did not breach Sections 269SS/ST. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents and individual case analysis to support its decision, dismissing the Assessing Officer&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties under Section 271D for both assessment years, finding that the journal entries were made for legitimate business purposes, constituted reasonable cause under Section 273B, and did not breach Sections 269SS/ST. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents and individual case analysis to support its decision, dismissing the Assessing Officer&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>