<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1189 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries and due application of mind. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction was found unjustified as the AO&#039;s assessments were deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, all four appeals of the assessees were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1189 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries and due application of mind. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction was found unjustified as the AO&#039;s assessments were deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, all four appeals of the assessees were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>