<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1172 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420134</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the avoidance application did not bar consideration where the application was filed during CIRP and the record showed suspended management&#039;s non-cooperation, incomplete financial data, and document collation difficulties during COVID-related restrictions. The transfer of the right to use a trademark to a related party for nominal consideration, within the look-back period and outside the ordinary course of business, was treated as an undervalued transaction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The transaction was held avoidable, and the trademark right was withdrawn from the respondent and vested back in the corporate debtor to support implementation of the resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:23:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1172 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420134</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the avoidance application did not bar consideration where the application was filed during CIRP and the record showed suspended management&#039;s non-cooperation, incomplete financial data, and document collation difficulties during COVID-related restrictions. The transfer of the right to use a trademark to a related party for nominal consideration, within the look-back period and outside the ordinary course of business, was treated as an undervalued transaction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The transaction was held avoidable, and the trademark right was withdrawn from the respondent and vested back in the corporate debtor to support implementation of the resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>