https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420131 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a petition under Article 226, quashing show cause notices due to unjust delays in adjudication by the respondents. The Court emphasized the duty to conclude proceedings promptly, highlighted lack of communication regarding transfer to call book, and directed the refund of recovered amounts with interest. The decision underscored the significance of timely adjudication, the obligation to inform parties about procedural actions, and preventing undue hardship to petitioners. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420131 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a petition under Article 226, quashing show cause notices due to unjust delays in adjudication by the respondents. The Court emphasized the duty to conclude proceedings promptly, highlighted lack of communication regarding transfer to call book, and directed the refund of recovered amounts with interest. The decision underscored the significance of timely adjudication, the obligation to inform parties about procedural actions, and preventing undue hardship to petitioners. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420131