<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1168 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420130</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed in part, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and granting refund on CENVAT credit for renting of immovable property. The matter of eligibility for credit on other services was remanded back for further examination, with the Appellant required to produce necessary documentary proof within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1168 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420130</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed in part, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and granting refund on CENVAT credit for renting of immovable property. The matter of eligibility for credit on other services was remanded back for further examination, with the Appellant required to produce necessary documentary proof within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>