https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420121 The High Court emphasized the importance of the alternative remedy principle but acknowledged its discretion to entertain writ petitions in exceptional cases. In W.P.(C.) No. 3801/2014, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Consumer Forum's orders due to lack of jurisdiction in interfering with the bank's recovery proceedings. In W.P.(C.) No. 36086/2015, the court partially allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order and remanding the matter for reconsideration to allow the petitioner to raise jurisdictional contentions. The judgment highlights the significance of the Consumer Protection Act's redressal mechanism and limits on entertaining writ petitions against consumer forum orders. en-us Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420121 The High Court emphasized the importance of the alternative remedy principle but acknowledged its discretion to entertain writ petitions in exceptional cases. In W.P.(C.) No. 3801/2014, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Consumer Forum's orders due to lack of jurisdiction in interfering with the bank's recovery proceedings. In W.P.(C.) No. 36086/2015, the court partially allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order and remanding the matter for reconsideration to allow the petitioner to raise jurisdictional contentions. The judgment highlights the significance of the Consumer Protection Act's redressal mechanism and limits on entertaining writ petitions against consumer forum orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420121