<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28403</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the burden of proving concealment rests with the Revenue. The conditional nature of the admission in the revised return and the lack of evidence beyond it supported the cancellation of penalties. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, citing previous case law and affirming the justification for canceling the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28403</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the burden of proving concealment rests with the Revenue. The conditional nature of the admission in the revised return and the lack of evidence beyond it supported the cancellation of penalties. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, citing previous case law and affirming the justification for canceling the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>