<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Director Cleared in TDS Non-Deduction Case Due to Faulty Notice u/ss 276B and 2(35.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62616</link>
    <description>Prosecution against the Director u/s 276B - Principal officer of the Accused Company - Compliance u/s 2(35) - Punishable offence for non deduction of TDS - The mandatory requirement is not complied with and the very contention is also that the notice given in terms of Ex.P2 is not in compliance of Section 2(35) - The order passed by the Trial Court discharging the respondent No.2 sustained - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:14:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Director Cleared in TDS Non-Deduction Case Due to Faulty Notice u/ss 276B and 2(35.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62616</link>
      <description>Prosecution against the Director u/s 276B - Principal officer of the Accused Company - Compliance u/s 2(35) - Punishable offence for non deduction of TDS - The mandatory requirement is not complied with and the very contention is also that the notice given in terms of Ex.P2 is not in compliance of Section 2(35) - The order passed by the Trial Court discharging the respondent No.2 sustained - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:14:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>