<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1147 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420109</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that GST is not leviable on employees&#039; portion of canteen charges collected by the company and paid to canteen service providers at both factory and head office locations. The company merely acted as a conduit without retaining any profit from this arrangement. Since GST was deemed not applicable on these transactions, the questions regarding input tax credit availability and restrictions were considered moot. The court determined that the company&#039;s arrangement with canteen service providers did not constitute a taxable service as the company was only facilitating payments without adding a profit margin.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1147 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420109</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that GST is not leviable on employees&#039; portion of canteen charges collected by the company and paid to canteen service providers at both factory and head office locations. The company merely acted as a conduit without retaining any profit from this arrangement. Since GST was deemed not applicable on these transactions, the questions regarding input tax credit availability and restrictions were considered moot. The court determined that the company&#039;s arrangement with canteen service providers did not constitute a taxable service as the company was only facilitating payments without adding a profit margin.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>