<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1138 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420100</link>
    <description>The ITAT Rajkot upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in both issues, emphasizing the importance of consistent valuation methods and concrete evidence in assessing tax liabilities. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 09:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1138 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420100</link>
      <description>The ITAT Rajkot upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in both issues, emphasizing the importance of consistent valuation methods and concrete evidence in assessing tax liabilities. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>