<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1124 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to ESI and PF for the assessment year 2018-19. The Tribunal held that the Finance Act, 2021 amendment introducing Explanation-5 should be applied prospectively from the assessment year 2021-22 onwards. The decision was based on various court rulings, emphasizing the jurisdiction of the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and the non-retrospective application of the amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1124 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to ESI and PF for the assessment year 2018-19. The Tribunal held that the Finance Act, 2021 amendment introducing Explanation-5 should be applied prospectively from the assessment year 2021-22 onwards. The decision was based on various court rulings, emphasizing the jurisdiction of the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and the non-retrospective application of the amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>