<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1121 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the availability of interest-free funds for investments and the absence of utilization of borrowed funds for generating exempt income. The disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was deemed unjustified and was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1121 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the availability of interest-free funds for investments and the absence of utilization of borrowed funds for generating exempt income. The disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was deemed unjustified and was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>