<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1111 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420073</link>
    <description>A disbursed loan carrying interest and governed by repayment terms, default clauses and security arrangements constituted financial debt because it was advanced for consideration for the time value of money. Default was established from the repayment record and demand notices, so admission of the Section 7 insolvency application was justified. The tribunal also held that insolvency claims and proceedings may proceed in parallel against co-borrowers and personal guarantors for the same underlying liability, since their obligation was joint and co-extensive and the Code does not bar concurrent pursuit until actual recovery is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1111 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420073</link>
      <description>A disbursed loan carrying interest and governed by repayment terms, default clauses and security arrangements constituted financial debt because it was advanced for consideration for the time value of money. Default was established from the repayment record and demand notices, so admission of the Section 7 insolvency application was justified. The tribunal also held that insolvency claims and proceedings may proceed in parallel against co-borrowers and personal guarantors for the same underlying liability, since their obligation was joint and co-extensive and the Code does not bar concurrent pursuit until actual recovery is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>