<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1104 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the First Appellate Authority, which had reinstated the demand of interest and penalty under Sections 75 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found the show-cause notice unnecessary as the tax and interest had been paid, aligning with a previous High Court ruling. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, restoring the original Order-in-Original and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:59:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1104 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the First Appellate Authority, which had reinstated the demand of interest and penalty under Sections 75 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found the show-cause notice unnecessary as the tax and interest had been paid, aligning with a previous High Court ruling. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, restoring the original Order-in-Original and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>