<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1101 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the appellants and another party were not related for excise duty purposes. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE for bearings used in wind-operated electricity generators.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1101 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the appellants and another party were not related for excise duty purposes. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE for bearings used in wind-operated electricity generators.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>