<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the previous decision, and directed the Adjudicating Authority to refund the amount of Rs. 9,85,827 to the appellant within 45 days, along with applicable interest. This ruling emphasized the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim a refund based on their eligibility for cenvat credit under the previous law, despite the implementation of the GST regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the previous decision, and directed the Adjudicating Authority to refund the amount of Rs. 9,85,827 to the appellant within 45 days, along with applicable interest. This ruling emphasized the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim a refund based on their eligibility for cenvat credit under the previous law, despite the implementation of the GST regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>