https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420058 Once issuance of the cheque and the drawer's signature were admitted, a statutory presumption of legally enforceable debt arose under cheque dishonour law. The accused had to rebut that presumption with credible material, but the defence of loss, delivery to another person, and misuse remained inconsistent and unsubstantiated by the complaint record or the Section 313 CrPC statement. The complaint evidence, bank return memo, legal notice, and proof of service supported the prosecution version, and the courts below found no infirmity in the conviction, sentence, or compensation. Revision interference was therefore unwarranted. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:58:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420058 Once issuance of the cheque and the drawer's signature were admitted, a statutory presumption of legally enforceable debt arose under cheque dishonour law. The accused had to rebut that presumption with credible material, but the defence of loss, delivery to another person, and misuse remained inconsistent and unsubstantiated by the complaint record or the Section 313 CrPC statement. The complaint evidence, bank return memo, legal notice, and proof of service supported the prosecution version, and the courts below found no infirmity in the conviction, sentence, or compensation. Revision interference was therefore unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420058