<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1408 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 as it was based on the proposal from the Income Tax Officer without independent examination, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Commissioner to independently assess records before initiating such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:58:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1408 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 as it was based on the proposal from the Income Tax Officer without independent examination, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Commissioner to independently assess records before initiating such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>