https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301306 Coastal Regulation Zone norms were treated as valid environmental controls under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the Court stressed that such rules must be strictly implemented because tolerance of violations undermines ecological protection and the right to life. The 19.2.1991 notification was upheld as legally valid, while complaints of non-implementation were left to be pursued before the High Courts and through administrative compliance. The 18.8.1994 relaxations were partly struck down: the 200 metre construction proviso and the reduction of the tidal river, creek and backwater restriction to 50 metres were held arbitrary and illegal, while certain limited permissions were upheld and the FSI rule was modified. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301306 Coastal Regulation Zone norms were treated as valid environmental controls under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the Court stressed that such rules must be strictly implemented because tolerance of violations undermines ecological protection and the right to life. The 19.2.1991 notification was upheld as legally valid, while complaints of non-implementation were left to be pursued before the High Courts and through administrative compliance. The 18.8.1994 relaxations were partly struck down: the 200 metre construction proviso and the reduction of the tidal river, creek and backwater restriction to 50 metres were held arbitrary and illegal, while certain limited permissions were upheld and the FSI rule was modified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301306