https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301300 A revision against a decree on a special-case reference was treated as maintainable because the ordinary appeal route did not apply and supervisory jurisdiction was the proper remedy. The Court also held that jurisdiction could not be assumed on a reference for delivery of property unless the written agreement strictly complied with the prescribed procedure, including stating the estimated value of the property where that value governed pecuniary jurisdiction. As the agreement omitted that essential value, the procedural condition precedent was not met and the decree was set aside insofar as it related to the petitioner's land. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:49:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301300 A revision against a decree on a special-case reference was treated as maintainable because the ordinary appeal route did not apply and supervisory jurisdiction was the proper remedy. The Court also held that jurisdiction could not be assumed on a reference for delivery of property unless the written agreement strictly complied with the prescribed procedure, including stating the estimated value of the property where that value governed pecuniary jurisdiction. As the agreement omitted that essential value, the procedural condition precedent was not met and the decree was set aside insofar as it related to the petitioner's land. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301300