<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1060 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to a pre-existing dispute over services provided and the absence of proof of delivery of the demand notice. Compliance with procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was emphasized, highlighting the necessity for clarity in resolving disputes before commencing insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1060 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to a pre-existing dispute over services provided and the absence of proof of delivery of the demand notice. Compliance with procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was emphasized, highlighting the necessity for clarity in resolving disputes before commencing insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>