<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1053 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420015</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, directing the trial Magistrate to proceed with the case in accordance with the law. The interim order was vacated, and the court emphasized that defenses regarding the nature of the cheque as security or for discharge of debt are matters to be determined during trial, not at the initial stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1053 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420015</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, directing the trial Magistrate to proceed with the case in accordance with the law. The interim order was vacated, and the court emphasized that defenses regarding the nature of the cheque as security or for discharge of debt are matters to be determined during trial, not at the initial stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>