<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1363 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301296</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the jurisdiction of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (CDRC) to entertain a complaint. The court emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy through an appeal before the State Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It highlighted that the petitioners should utilize the established appellate mechanism rather than burdening the High Court with such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1363 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301296</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the jurisdiction of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (CDRC) to entertain a complaint. The court emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy through an appeal before the State Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It highlighted that the petitioners should utilize the established appellate mechanism rather than burdening the High Court with such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>