https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301286 The appeal was dismissed, upholding the addition of Rs. 4,07,880 to the assessee's income for the block period 1.4.1996 to 2.1.2003. The tribunal found no evidence to support the assessee's claim that the entire amount of jewelry should be considered a gift, as no material was presented to determine the income disclosed by the parents and parents-in-law at the time of marriage. The addition was confirmed by the ld. CIT(A), and the tribunal's decision was pronounced on 03.06.2011. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301286 The appeal was dismissed, upholding the addition of Rs. 4,07,880 to the assessee's income for the block period 1.4.1996 to 2.1.2003. The tribunal found no evidence to support the assessee's claim that the entire amount of jewelry should be considered a gift, as no material was presented to determine the income disclosed by the parents and parents-in-law at the time of marriage. The addition was confirmed by the ld. CIT(A), and the tribunal's decision was pronounced on 03.06.2011. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301286