<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Exempt Capital Gain Mistakenly Taxed; Violates Article 265 and Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62575</link>
    <description>Exempted capital gain wrongly shown in the belated return as taxable - just because the assessee inadvertently or by ignorance has shown the exempt income as exigible to tax, the AO/CPC ought not to have treated the same as taxable income and thereby taxed the exempt income because Article 265 of the Constitution, title reads &quot; Taxes not to be imposed saved by authority of law&#039;&#039; and the Article reads &#039;No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law&#039;. Here in this case the Parliament has exempted this compensation (for acquiring land) from taxation as per Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act. So the CPC/AO ought not to have taxed the same at the first place. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:39:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Exempt Capital Gain Mistakenly Taxed; Violates Article 265 and Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62575</link>
      <description>Exempted capital gain wrongly shown in the belated return as taxable - just because the assessee inadvertently or by ignorance has shown the exempt income as exigible to tax, the AO/CPC ought not to have treated the same as taxable income and thereby taxed the exempt income because Article 265 of the Constitution, title reads &quot; Taxes not to be imposed saved by authority of law&#039;&#039; and the Article reads &#039;No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law&#039;. Here in this case the Parliament has exempted this compensation (for acquiring land) from taxation as per Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act. So the CPC/AO ought not to have taxed the same at the first place. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:39:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>