<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1038 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420000</link>
    <description>The court quashed cognizance orders under Sections 276(B) and 278(B) of the Income Tax Act as prosecution was initiated after TDS amounts and interest were deposited, contrary to CBDT guidelines. It was held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of court process. The petitions were allowed, and all criminal proceedings and cognizance orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1038 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420000</link>
      <description>The court quashed cognizance orders under Sections 276(B) and 278(B) of the Income Tax Act as prosecution was initiated after TDS amounts and interest were deposited, contrary to CBDT guidelines. It was held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of court process. The petitions were allowed, and all criminal proceedings and cognizance orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>