<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1035 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419997</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala upheld the assessing officer&#039;s jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act after a remand order under section 263. The court found that the satisfaction for penalty initiation was validly expressed in the subsequent assessment order. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the penalty order was dismissed, granting the petitioner the option to pursue statutory remedies by way of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1035 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419997</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala upheld the assessing officer&#039;s jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act after a remand order under section 263. The court found that the satisfaction for penalty initiation was validly expressed in the subsequent assessment order. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the penalty order was dismissed, granting the petitioner the option to pursue statutory remedies by way of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>