<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1030 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, holding that the disallowance of payment of PF/ESI was not justified, employees&#039; contribution to PF/ESI before the due date of filing return is deductible, amendments were not retrospective, and High Court decisions supported the assessee. The rejection of the rectification application was crucial, leading to appeals. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on all issues, referencing legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1030 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, holding that the disallowance of payment of PF/ESI was not justified, employees&#039; contribution to PF/ESI before the due date of filing return is deductible, amendments were not retrospective, and High Court decisions supported the assessee. The rejection of the rectification application was crucial, leading to appeals. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on all issues, referencing legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>