<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 3 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28376</link>
    <description>HC held that the AAC&#039;s remand powers exceed those of the Tribunal: on remand by the AAC the ITO may make a fresh assessment with powers akin to s.143(3), unless limited by explicit AAC directions, whereas a Tribunal remand confines the ITO strictly to the subject-matter of the appeal. The Court found the ITO had exceeded the Tribunal&#039;s limited directions by probing matters beyond the single specified sale transaction; therefore three additions were deleted and the ITO&#039;s broader inquiries and notices under ss.143(3)/142(1) were unjustified. Proceedings under ss.147/148 were also held invalid while the original return and assessment remained pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 3 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28376</link>
      <description>HC held that the AAC&#039;s remand powers exceed those of the Tribunal: on remand by the AAC the ITO may make a fresh assessment with powers akin to s.143(3), unless limited by explicit AAC directions, whereas a Tribunal remand confines the ITO strictly to the subject-matter of the appeal. The Court found the ITO had exceeded the Tribunal&#039;s limited directions by probing matters beyond the single specified sale transaction; therefore three additions were deleted and the ITO&#039;s broader inquiries and notices under ss.143(3)/142(1) were unjustified. Proceedings under ss.147/148 were also held invalid while the original return and assessment remained pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>