<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1022 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for AY 2008-09 for statistical purposes, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of payments to non-residents and re-examine the VRS compensation issue. The appeal for AY 2009-10 was allowed, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of payments to non-residents. For AY 2010-11, the appeal was partly allowed, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A and directing the AO to delete the disallowance of payments to non-residents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1022 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for AY 2008-09 for statistical purposes, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of payments to non-residents and re-examine the VRS compensation issue. The appeal for AY 2009-10 was allowed, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of payments to non-residents. For AY 2010-11, the appeal was partly allowed, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A and directing the AO to delete the disallowance of payments to non-residents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>