<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1021 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the revisionary jurisdiction exercised by the Ld. PCIT under section 263 was barred by limitation as the issue was not part of the reassessment proceedings but of the original assessment. The reassessment order dated 31.12.2018 could not be revised for an issue unrelated to the reassessment. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the revisionary jurisdiction was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:22:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1021 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the revisionary jurisdiction exercised by the Ld. PCIT under section 263 was barred by limitation as the issue was not part of the reassessment proceedings but of the original assessment. The reassessment order dated 31.12.2018 could not be revised for an issue unrelated to the reassessment. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the revisionary jurisdiction was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>