<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419966</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 112 (a) &amp;amp; 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on Shri Sanjay Arora and Shri Nawal Kishore Singh for their involvement in fraudulent imports, rejecting claims of identity theft. The order confirmed their active participation in the scheme, dismissing appeals and affirming their penalties. The Tribunal did not address CONCOR&#039;s involvement due to a separate pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419966</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 112 (a) &amp;amp; 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on Shri Sanjay Arora and Shri Nawal Kishore Singh for their involvement in fraudulent imports, rejecting claims of identity theft. The order confirmed their active participation in the scheme, dismissing appeals and affirming their penalties. The Tribunal did not address CONCOR&#039;s involvement due to a separate pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>