<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1833 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301265</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal ordering a fresh examination by the Assessing Officer in light of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the USA. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to consider the relevant treaty provisions and directed a re-examination of the matter with due process for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:20:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1833 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301265</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal ordering a fresh examination by the Assessing Officer in light of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the USA. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to consider the relevant treaty provisions and directed a re-examination of the matter with due process for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>