<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1316 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301279</link>
    <description>At the threshold stage of an Order VII Rule 11 CPC application, the court may examine only the averments in the election petition and the supporting documents. On that basis, the Delhi HC stated that disclosure requirements in election affidavits cover educational qualifications and relevant criminal antecedents, and that a false declaration about educational qualification may fall within Section 123(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Defects in verification or in Form 25 were treated as curable and not a basis for summary rejection. The alleged mismatch between pleadings and documents also did not justify rejection, since the petition required trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1316 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301279</link>
      <description>At the threshold stage of an Order VII Rule 11 CPC application, the court may examine only the averments in the election petition and the supporting documents. On that basis, the Delhi HC stated that disclosure requirements in election affidavits cover educational qualifications and relevant criminal antecedents, and that a false declaration about educational qualification may fall within Section 123(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Defects in verification or in Form 25 were treated as curable and not a basis for summary rejection. The alleged mismatch between pleadings and documents also did not justify rejection, since the petition required trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>