<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 33 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28369</link>
    <description>A coparcener&#039;s relinquishment of a substantially larger debt at partition, when tied to adjustment of both assets and liabilities in a single transaction, was treated as part of the partition arrangement rather than a separate act. Because partition requires equal division of assets and liabilities, a party giving up a larger claim so the other receives a larger benefit creates an unequal partition. Where such unequal division is carried out pursuant to an understanding between the parties, it is treated as a disposition amounting to a gift under the Estate Duty Act, and the corresponding value is includible in the principal value of the estate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:25:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 33 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28369</link>
      <description>A coparcener&#039;s relinquishment of a substantially larger debt at partition, when tied to adjustment of both assets and liabilities in a single transaction, was treated as part of the partition arrangement rather than a separate act. Because partition requires equal division of assets and liabilities, a party giving up a larger claim so the other receives a larger benefit creates an unequal partition. Where such unequal division is carried out pursuant to an understanding between the parties, it is treated as a disposition amounting to a gift under the Estate Duty Act, and the corresponding value is includible in the principal value of the estate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>