https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301260 The High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is wide but must be used sparingly and only to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Where Section 70(2) CrPC provides a specific mechanism for cancellation of a warrant by the issuing court, that statutory remedy should ordinarily be pursued first. Direct recourse to Section 482 should not replace the procedure laid down in the Code, except in exceptional cases. The result is that a petition under Section 482 for simple recall or cancellation of a non-bailable warrant is not maintainable when relief remains available before the issuing court. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:10:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301260 The High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is wide but must be used sparingly and only to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Where Section 70(2) CrPC provides a specific mechanism for cancellation of a warrant by the issuing court, that statutory remedy should ordinarily be pursued first. Direct recourse to Section 482 should not replace the procedure laid down in the Code, except in exceptional cases. The result is that a petition under Section 482 for simple recall or cancellation of a non-bailable warrant is not maintainable when relief remains available before the issuing court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301260