https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301259 Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act was interpreted as confining the Court's power to directing acts to be done or forborne within its ordinary original civil jurisdiction. Relief seeking restoration of a water connection at premises outside those territorial limits was therefore beyond jurisdiction. The text also states that Section 45 relief was barred where an equally beneficial and effective alternative remedy existed, and a suit for mandatory injunction would have secured the same precise relief. On that basis, the requested mandamus-type relief was unavailable. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:43:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301259 Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act was interpreted as confining the Court's power to directing acts to be done or forborne within its ordinary original civil jurisdiction. Relief seeking restoration of a water connection at premises outside those territorial limits was therefore beyond jurisdiction. The text also states that Section 45 relief was barred where an equally beneficial and effective alternative remedy existed, and a suit for mandatory injunction would have secured the same precise relief. On that basis, the requested mandamus-type relief was unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301259