<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 977 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419939</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is available only where arrest is apprehended for a non-bailable offence. Under Section 132 of the CGST Act, offences are generally bailable and non-cognizable, except those specifically covered by sub-section (5), which are cognizable and non-bailable. As the alleged GST offence was treated as bailable, the court held that jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail was unavailable and the application was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 977 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419939</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is available only where arrest is apprehended for a non-bailable offence. Under Section 132 of the CGST Act, offences are generally bailable and non-cognizable, except those specifically covered by sub-section (5), which are cognizable and non-bailable. As the alleged GST offence was treated as bailable, the court held that jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail was unavailable and the application was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>