<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 969 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419931</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the deduction under section 80IB(10) for unaccounted receipts from a project. The ITAT directed the assessing officer to allow the deduction on the amount in question. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the appeal for the penalty issue to be reconsidered based on the clarification provided by the assessee regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The penalty issue was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:40:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 969 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419931</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the deduction under section 80IB(10) for unaccounted receipts from a project. The ITAT directed the assessing officer to allow the deduction on the amount in question. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the appeal for the penalty issue to be reconsidered based on the clarification provided by the assessee regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The penalty issue was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>