<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 965 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the AO for fresh examination in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision that payments for online advertisement services do not constitute royalty and are not subject to TDS under section 195. The AO was directed to review the Master Services Agreement to determine the nature of services rendered. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for reconsideration based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 965 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the AO for fresh examination in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision that payments for online advertisement services do not constitute royalty and are not subject to TDS under section 195. The AO was directed to review the Master Services Agreement to determine the nature of services rendered. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for reconsideration based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>