<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 959 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue regarding the deduction u/s.80IA and the PCIT&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The decision highlighted the importance of following legal provisions and precedents while also considering the interpretative nature of tax laws in assessing deductions and compliance with filing deadlines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 959 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue regarding the deduction u/s.80IA and the PCIT&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The decision highlighted the importance of following legal provisions and precedents while also considering the interpretative nature of tax laws in assessing deductions and compliance with filing deadlines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>