<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 956 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419918</link>
    <description>The High Court directed that no recovery should be made from the appellant until the appeal pending before the Tribunal is disposed of. The Court left the questions of law raised in the appeal open for separate proceedings. Additionally, the Tribunal was instructed to expedite the disposal of the appeal relating to the collection of extra duty deposit within four months. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was disposed of with no costs, and the connected applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 956 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419918</link>
      <description>The High Court directed that no recovery should be made from the appellant until the appeal pending before the Tribunal is disposed of. The Court left the questions of law raised in the appeal open for separate proceedings. Additionally, the Tribunal was instructed to expedite the disposal of the appeal relating to the collection of extra duty deposit within four months. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was disposed of with no costs, and the connected applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>