https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419907 The Tribunal partly allowed the application under Sections 19(2) and 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, directing the Suspended Directors to cooperate with the Resolution Professional for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Despite pending proceedings, non-cooperation from the Respondents was deemed insufficient to impede the time-bound CIRP. The decision emphasized the obligation of all personnel associated with the Corporate Debtor to provide necessary information and documents for the smooth progress of the CIRP until completion. en-us Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:38:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419907 The Tribunal partly allowed the application under Sections 19(2) and 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, directing the Suspended Directors to cooperate with the Resolution Professional for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Despite pending proceedings, non-cooperation from the Respondents was deemed insufficient to impede the time-bound CIRP. The decision emphasized the obligation of all personnel associated with the Corporate Debtor to provide necessary information and documents for the smooth progress of the CIRP until completion. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419907