<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 942 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419904</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that once a prosecution complaint is filed and cognizance is taken by the Special Court, the writ challenge to a look-out circular may be declined on the ground of an efficacious alternative remedy. The Special Court, being seized of the criminal complaint, is the proper forum to consider all factual and legal objections, including alleged mala fides, withdrawal of the circular and permission to travel abroad. The High Court also declined to examine the challenge to the Ministry of Home Affairs memoranda because no specific prayer had been sought to quash them. The writ petition and connected applications were closed, leaving the petitioner to seek relief before the Special Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 942 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419904</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that once a prosecution complaint is filed and cognizance is taken by the Special Court, the writ challenge to a look-out circular may be declined on the ground of an efficacious alternative remedy. The Special Court, being seized of the criminal complaint, is the proper forum to consider all factual and legal objections, including alleged mala fides, withdrawal of the circular and permission to travel abroad. The High Court also declined to examine the challenge to the Ministry of Home Affairs memoranda because no specific prayer had been sought to quash them. The writ petition and connected applications were closed, leaving the petitioner to seek relief before the Special Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>