<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 931 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419893</link>
    <description>Classification under the sales tax schedule depended on ordinary commercial parlance and functional identity, so diapers were not treated as hosiery goods or readymade garments and the Department&#039;s view was upheld. Trade discount was deductible because the Tribunal&#039;s refusal was internally inconsistent, and the assessee obtained relief on that point. Turnover enhancement based on alleged suppression was justified only partly: one unsubstantiated container supported some addition, but a tenfold enhancement was disproportionate and was reduced to five times. Tax paid at the check-post was not adjustable for goods not specifically reflected in the registration certificate, so the Department&#039;s view was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:37:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 931 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419893</link>
      <description>Classification under the sales tax schedule depended on ordinary commercial parlance and functional identity, so diapers were not treated as hosiery goods or readymade garments and the Department&#039;s view was upheld. Trade discount was deductible because the Tribunal&#039;s refusal was internally inconsistent, and the assessee obtained relief on that point. Turnover enhancement based on alleged suppression was justified only partly: one unsubstantiated container supported some addition, but a tenfold enhancement was disproportionate and was reduced to five times. Tax paid at the check-post was not adjustable for goods not specifically reflected in the registration certificate, so the Department&#039;s view was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>