<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 927 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419889</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a show-cause notice under the wilful defaulter framework was premature because the notice only commenced a prima facie, tentative process and the affected party still had a full opportunity to make representations before the Wilful Defaulter Committee and, if needed, the review mechanism. Non-disclosure of the underlying documents in the notice did not vitiate the proceedings at that nascent stage, especially where the materials were available in the writ proceedings and could be answered before the competent committees. The court declined to examine the merits of the allegations before the administrative process ran its course, and the writ petition was not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 927 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419889</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a show-cause notice under the wilful defaulter framework was premature because the notice only commenced a prima facie, tentative process and the affected party still had a full opportunity to make representations before the Wilful Defaulter Committee and, if needed, the review mechanism. Non-disclosure of the underlying documents in the notice did not vitiate the proceedings at that nascent stage, especially where the materials were available in the writ proceedings and could be answered before the competent committees. The court declined to examine the merits of the allegations before the administrative process ran its course, and the writ petition was not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>